Ranorex Logo

Meaningful Metrics for DevOps: An Infographic

|
Devops metrics

“If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it,” is a truism in business. The corollary principle is that you get what you measure. People are human: when time is short and pressure is on, they’ll focus on delivering the metrics that business values.

DevOps leaders know how important it is to avoid relying on a single metric like deployment frequency, which could lead to a team that values speed over quality.

Here are four key metrics that can help guide and improve the practice of lean and DevOps development teams:

  • Release count
  • Lead time
  • Change failure rate
  • Mean time to recover

Let’s take a look at what the recent State of DevOps report has to say about how high-performing teams measure up on these metrics:

Infographic-Accelerate-scaled

Release Count: High-performing teams frequently release small sofware changes. The DevOps report found that high-performing teams released in small batches and focused on trends, leading to releasing 46 times more frequently than struggling teams.

Lead time: Time from when the issue identified and defined, to when work begins. On high-performing teams with smaller backlogs of work, this time from work defined to begin averages 440 times faster than struggling teams that have trouble breaking things down (i.e., a team with a twelve-month design roadblock versus one that tackles a two-week sprint).

Change failure rate: A failed change is one that requires immediate rollback. High-performing teams build resilient systems with micro-changes that are unlikely to destabilize the whole. Teams in the struggling group either focus on “no failures” (and release incredibly slowly) or are unable to roll back easily, leading to outages. A struggling group averages 5 times more failed changes as a percentage of releases.

Mean time to recover: With easy rollbacks and strong monitoring, a production problem might take minutes to find and moments to resolve. High-performing teams see issues as a change to learn, and they average a time to resolve that is 170 times faster than the struggling peer group.

All-in-one Test Automation

Cross-Technology | Cross-Device | Cross-Platform

In This Article

Sign up for our newsletter

Share this article

Related Articles

Generative-AI-in-Software-Testing-A-Complete-Guide-blog-image

Generative AI in Software Testing: A Complete Guide

July 2, 2026
AI-assisted development is increasing the volume and speed of software change, which puts more pressure on QA teams to keep coverage current without adding equivalent headcount. That is one reason AI has moved from an experimental topic to a practical one in software testing. Gen...
software testing trends

8 Software Testing Trends Shaping QA in 2026

June 26, 2026
More than half of all code, 53% on average, is now AI-generated or AI-assisted. That sounds like a productivity windfall until you look at what it does to testing. 61% of teams report moderate to dramatic increases in QA workload from that code, and only 17% say AI-driven testing...
Integration-testing-complete-guide-blog-image

Integration Testing: A Complete Guide for QA Teams

June 19, 2026
The takeaway in 30 seconds What is integration testing in QA? Integration testing is a type of software testing that verifies that individual software modules communicate and exchange data as expected when combined. Where unit testing validates that each component works correctly...